| |
|
|
August
5 th, 2007
Celebrating Simcoe Day
Rev.
Bill Bruce
This
statutory holiday in Ontario, known as a ‘municipal holiday’,
in Toronto is ‘Simcoe Day’. John Graves Simcoe was the governor
of Upper Canada from 1791 to 1796, and founder of the town of York, later
renamed Toronto. Terence Corcoran in the National Post this week proposed
we rename this holiday ‘Victories Day’ in honour of our armed
forces. After all, would this not just be an expansion from celebrating
one Imperial soldier, to be more inclusive? I think not.
Simcoe lived 54 years, and 5 of those years, aged 39 to 44, he was posted
to these Canadas. For which 5 year stint will you be remembered, and by
whom? What is privileged, valorized, or taught by the ways we tell our
stories, or his story? Peace, order and good government were the virtues
highly valued by ‘Toronto the Good’, that WASP loyalist establishment
formed in reaction to the American Revolution. Is that your heritage,
and your celebration this summer?
Simcoe might instead tell us of his 5 year tour of duty, aged 25 to 30,
with the Queen’s Rangers. He began as a Captain at Staten Island,
New York and fought through the revolutionary wars. As an imperial officer,
he trained and led local militia loyalists. He wanted to recruit freed
slaves as regular soldiers, resisted by slave-owning fellow officers.
Once, routing rebels in a clearing, he stopped his soldiers shooting fleeing
men, crying ‘It’s not civilized to shoot men in the back!’
One of the fleeing officers sent a letter of thanks for the chivalry,
signed ‘George Washington’. Simcoe’s military successes,
though in a losing cause, had him promoted to Colonel.
Simcoe spent his 30’s, and the last 10 years of his life, in domestic
life and civic duties in Devon. He was gentry, who owned land if not title,
a successful and prosperous farmer and landlord. As a member of Parliament,
he was a supporter of William Wilberforce, opposed to slave trade, but
hardly an advocate of social equality for all. When the state of Vermont
join the original 13 colonies in 1791, he lobbied people like Yonge and
Nepean for support for the 8000 Loyalists settling in Canada, including
some who had served with him before. He was not a reactionary, but a conservative
committed to the duties that matched his privileges and his loyalties.
Simcoe planned to return from Toronto in 1796 as a Major General in his
prime. A townhouse and seat in Parliament in London, and his estates and
defence duties in Devon called him home. Over his objections, he was sent
south to meet another revolution instead. Toussant L’Ouverture was
leading a successful black republican uprising on the island of Hispaniola
we know as Haiti. As the French revolution abolished slavery in France,
and withdrew colonial claims, the British invaded in a futile reactionary
cause. Simcoe arrived, held beachhead ports while castigating the local
white citizens’ treatments of blacks, and in 6 months, sailed home,
his domestic ambitions damaged by his refusal to pursue a futile racist
imperial adventure without purpose or support.
Hosea the prophet spoke to Israel in affluent times, reminding them of
their roots and their risks. Poised between the empires of Assyria to
the north, and Egypt to the south, the rich were trading with both sides,
playing both ends against the middle, making hay while the sun shone,
profiteering in a moment when neither empire would anger the other by
claiming Israel as theirs. Hosea begged the people to remember their roots
as slaves in Egypt, of their days as Hapiru refugees, strangers in a strange
land, a people being fed and taught to walk like baby by mother:
‘When Israel was a child, I loved him, and out of Egypt I called
my son. The more I called them, the more they went form me: they kept
sacrificing to the Baals, and offering incense to idols. Yet it was I
who taught Ephraim to walk. I took them up in my arms: but they did not
know that I healed them. I led them with cords of human kindness, with
bands of love. I was to them like those who lift infants to their cheeks.
I bent down to them and fed them. They shall return to the land of Egypt,
and Assyria shall be their king, because they have refused to return to
me.”
Hosea was remembered after Israel fell to the Assyrians, and in turn fell
Judah to Babylon, wherever people tried to make sense of how things go
wrong. Hosea names the predictable if not preventable sins of affluence,
which have their inevitable consequences in due course of empires. We
always forget our roots as slaves, and refugees. We always forget we were
slaves in Egypt. We always forget we were strangers in a strange land.
And sure enough, we get greedy, and lose empathy for others, maximizing
our own wealth now, without concern for the poor or the future.
Simcoe lived in times like those, and so do we. We are privileged, in
Canada and in Toronto. Our economic activity is valorized and rewarded
over those in the rest of the world and country. Some of us are making
hay while this sun shines, and profiteering, not only locally but globally.
But all of us start from a ‘social wage’ of social and economic
security unheard of elsewhere. Have we forgotten our identity as slaves,
refugees, and immigrants? Of course we have, again! Hosea’s message
is repeated for 2800 years because we are always somewhere in this story.
Simcoe lived in revolutionary times, as privileged landed gentry, though
not fully aristocratic. He was more affluent than most by far, but not
ever quite within the inner elite circles of power. He was like a lot
of United Church folks, middle class folks with professional skills essential
to our economic success, identified with, but not within, the ‘establishment’,
the ‘powers that be’. We can deny our privilege, or use it,
or lose it. Simcoe used his, if in a series of losing causes, an example
which might be far worthier of a statutory holiday than ‘Victories
Day’.
Should this be Simcoe Day, Caribana weekend, or Victories Day? Who are
we, or whose are we, as a people? Dismiss Simcoe as a WASP icon of colonialism
if you will. Perhaps, as George Grant taught us in Lament for a Nation,
the conservative loyalist vision next to the relentless progressive modernity
of America was doomed from the start. But let’s not forget our roots.
On a holiday weekend, worshiping in two big old buildings with a remnant
of a few folks, I kept asking those questions. The revolutionaries fought
for life, liberty, and the pursuit of property, and beat Simcoe in America.
The British who could not bear to concede the colonial crisis of a successful
black republic sharing a Caribbean island with Haiti, sent Simcoe to lose
that one too. Finally, The British appointed Simcoe the first commander
in chief to go to India in 1806, to provide oversight so the East India
Company could not claim unregulated rule of a continent. Simcoe died of
lead poisoning from the fresh paint of the ship bearing him to that last
duty.
Who are we, and whose country is this? Who gets to claim the wealth and
privilege, the valorized economic leverage of Toronto? Who is it among
us that builds moral, political, and financial capital, and who is it
among us that spends and dissipates and wastes it? There were black faces
in the loyalist ranks in 1777, and in Upper Canada and in muddy York.
When my great great grandfather Bill Bruce arrived in Peel Township near
Waterloo in 1840’s, the majority of residents in the county were
black, loyalists and refugees like us Ulster Scots.
“Teacher, tell my brother to divide the family inheritance with
me.” But Jesus said to him, “Friend, who set me to be a judge
or arbitrator over you?” And Jesus said to them “Take care!
Be on your guard against all kinds of greed; for one’s life does
not consist in the abundance of possessions.”
Now those I worshiped with on Sunday are not rich. I am relatively far
richer than they are. We are all tempted to share safe smug complacent
assurances, echoing the old commonplace: ‘money isn’t everything’.
None of us ever thinks she is rich – poll people with $1M assets
and $100K annual incomes, and they say they are ‘middle class’.
But ask the world, and they’ll tell you we are all rich, as Simcoe
was, relative to most people. So listen to the parable as rich folk:
Then he told them a parable:
“The land of a rich man produced abundantly.
And he thought to himself,
‘what should I do,
for I have no place to store my crops?’
Then he said,
‘I will do this:
I will pull down my barns and build larger ones,
and there I will store all my grain and my goods.
And I will say to my soul,
‘Soul, you have ample goods laid up for many years;
relax, eat, drink , be merry.’
But God said to him,
‘You fool!
This very night your life is being demanded of you
And the things you have prepared, whose will they be?’
So it is with those who store up treasures for themselves
but are not rich toward God.”
Why didn’t Simcoe just stay home and prosper? Or at least, after
he had made his name and rank in the American war, why not rest on those
laurels? Or in turn, why return to the Canadas, or obey the order to fight
in Hispaniola? Simcoe died of lead poisoning, in a fresh painted ship
H.M.S.Illustrious, advising the Portuguese start of the peninsular war
which would in turn kill his eldest son Francis. The India Board of Control
and the army would oversee the East India Company, but Simcoe would never
arrive to begin as Commander in Chief. The English occupied the Cape of
Good Hope, and prohibited trade but not ownership if slaves in the empire.
Why did Simcoe not just say to his soul ‘soul, you have ample goods
laid up for many years; relax, eat, drink, be merry?’ Perhaps it
would be better to ask ourselves, who all have enough: what makes us run?
Is it enough to get a good rent geared to income apartment, or move from
a ‘starter home’ barn to a bigger ‘dream home’
barn? When do you win, when you get the kids through college, or retire
with a good pension? Simcoe lived out conservative virtues of public service,
or civic responsibility, over and above his domestic business. What do
you serve?
The congregations with whom I worshiped on Sunday enjoy lavish trust assets
entrusted to their stewardship to serve our religious and charitable purposes.
Too often, we are satisfied with the lull before the next storm, with
the plans of some great new plan of redevelopment or tenancy. You fools
– what if this very night it were over? What and whom have we served?
Who does not claim too much control, assume too little burden, and enjoy
too much benefit from it all? Whose inheritance are we wasting, and what
next generation are we robbing?
Our denomination too often presents the faith as a ‘happily ever
after’ exercise in heritage preservation, or worse, adopts a trivial
cartoon or sitcom framework: ‘Have a Nice Day UC’. Daniel
Berrigan, active in human rights, desegregation and opposition to the
Vietnam War 40 years ago, acknowledged that his ministry was: ‘extremely
unsettling to a society of believers that thought it contained and expressed
the conscience of man, once and for all. However, he responded to his
critics in the following terms:
Being a Christian needs redefining in every age; and every age hesitates
between two great choices: that of insecurity in the world, and that of
a security that merely draws on what has gone before, and remains on safe
ground. The real effort, never really done with, is to discern what Christ
is saying to us from within the real world….
All else is a morticians job, or child’s game.
There’s a piety abroad that always asks ‘What Would Jesus
Do?’ For me, that’s wrong. Let Jesus be Jesus – messianism
is a bad career choice, ending around age 33, even if you don’t
start till you are 30. Your job is not to do what Jesus would do. The
job is taken, and Jesus is doing it well. You job is to be a faithful
human being in your own time and context, with your own gifts and opportunities.
So I might ask as a more modest first step: what would Simcoe do?
I think he’d take care of the duties of his station in life, and
discharge them honourably. I think he would not simply say to his soul
‘relax, eat drink, and be merry’ – but he would ask
what he owed in return for all that was entrusted to him, in privilege
and affluence. It’s not enough to seek ‘freedom 55’
– Simcoe died at 54! We owe much more, to become rich toward God.
Within a year of Simcoe’s death, his party and parliament banned
trade and transport of slaves. Within a decade of his death, his colony
has successfully stopped an American invasion. Reinhold Niebuhr, another
immigrant’s kid working in Detroit then New York, put it this way:
Nothing worth doing is completed in our lifetime; therefore, we must be
saved by hope.
Nothing true or beautiful or good makes complete sense in any immediate
context of history; therefore, we must be saved by faith.
Nothing we do, however virtuous, can be accomplished alone; therefore,
we are saved by love.
|
|
|
|